Nick Aldis faces the challenging task of organizing a compelling card from SmackDown for this year’s SummerSlam, focusing on the ongoing SummerSlam Solo Sikoa Jacob Fatu match for the United States Championship. This heated rivalry between Solo Sikoa and Jacob Fatu has created significant turmoil on the blue brand, demanding careful management to maintain the event’s prestige.
The match is slated to be a central attraction at SummerSlam, but Aldis is reportedly considering banning Tonga Loa, Talla Tonga, and JC Mateo from ringside. These three have consistently interfered in Solo Sikoa’s matches since Night of Champions, causing disruptions and affecting several main event contests. Aldis’s potential decision aims to secure a fair contest for the United States Championship, free from distractions or interference during the high-profile event.
Ensuring a Fair Contest for SummerSlam’s United States Title Clash
The presence of Tonga Loa, Talla Tonga, and JC Mateo alongside Solo Sikoa has complicated the mid-card scene for Aldis, as their interference has led to unpredictable match outcomes. For a grand stage like SummerSlam, Aldis is expected to take action that preserves the integrity of the Solo Sikoa vs Jacob Fatu matchup. By barring these allies from ringside, the United States Championship bout can unfold without interruption, allowing both wrestlers to showcase their skills in an unspoiled environment.

Fans have frequently criticized Solo Sikoa’s matches for becoming formulaic due to repeated faction involvement. A clean match without outside interference would inject new life into this long-standing rivalry, giving the bout a classic wrestling feel. This approach could elevate the storytelling and in-ring action, highlighting the tension between two former Bloodline members in a high-stakes battle.
Potential ‘Loser Leaves SmackDown’ Stipulation Could Change the Feud’s Stakes
In addition to banning key interference figures, Aldis might propose a high-risk condition for the SummerSlam match between Solo Sikoa and Jacob Fatu. The rumored stipulation being considered is a “Loser Leaves SmackDown” match, where the loser must exit the blue brand permanently. This stipulation would raise the stakes considerably, signaling a possible conclusion to the intense feud and adding emotional weight to the encounter.
Such a condition would likely be a significant narrative development, potentially setting the stage for one star’s departure or a character shift following SummerSlam. Aldis’s authority as SmackDown General Manager allows him to impose such decisive terms, using this stipulation as leverage to ensure both competitors deliver their best performance on the biggest stage. Although this remains speculation, the angle could dramatically impact the storyline moving forward.
Ultimately, Aldis’s management decisions, including possibly banning Tonga Loa, Talla Tonga, and JC Mateo from the ringside area and enforcing a “Loser Leaves SmackDown” condition, could transform this feud into one of the most compelling stories for WWE’s blue brand. The outcome of this match might have lasting consequences not only for Solo Sikoa and Jacob Fatu but for SmackDown’s broader mid-card landscape as well.
Our Reader’s Queries
Q. Is WrestleMania or SummerSlam bigger?
A. SummerSlam is a wrestling show put on every year by WWE, the top company in pro wrestling since 1988. Known as “The Biggest Party of the Summer,” it ranks as WWE’s second largest event, just after WrestleMania.
