VAR Farce in Ukraine and Italy: In what has been a season marked by contentious decisions aided by soccer’s Video Assistant Referee (VAR), the recent Euro 2024 qualifier between Ukraine and Italy added another layer to the controversy. The match, crucial for both teams, ended in a goalless draw, but the real drama unfolded in the dying moments.
With the score locked at 0-0 and the clock ticking into the third minute of additional time, Italy’s Bryan Cristante appeared to trip Ukraine’s Mykhailo Mudryk inside the penalty area. The referee, Jesús Gil Manzano, positioned just 10 yards away, opted not to award the penalty, despite having a clear view.
What makes the situation even more perplexing is that VAR seemingly didn’t review the challenge. This decision, or lack thereof, has ignited a storm of criticism, particularly from the Ukrainian side.
Ukraine desperately needed a win to secure the second spot in the group and an automatic qualification for Euro 2024. In contrast, a draw was sufficient for Italy to advance as runners-up to England. The goalless outcome now forces Ukraine into the Euro playoffs scheduled for March next year.
Also Read: AFL Draft Drama Unfolds: Reid, Curtin, and the Game-Changing Moves
The Ukrainian media has expressed frustration, labeling the decision as a “scandalous situation.” Former FIFA referee Miroslav Stupar questioned the absence of VAR intervention and the referee’s reluctance to make a decisive call. Stupar emphasized that had VAR been consulted, a penalty should have been awarded due to clear contact.
Outlets such as TSN criticized the decision as “erroneous,” echoing the sentiments of fans who felt Ukraine was unfairly treated. Football24 pointed out the perplexing aspect of both the referee and VAR choosing not to correct the potential mistake.
The aftermath of this VAR controversy raises questions about the system’s effectiveness and its impact on critical matches, leaving football enthusiasts and analysts debating the broader implications for fair play in the sport.