Recent discussions in wrestling circles highlight a growing debate regarding how WWE approaches the development of its rising stars, specifically drawing a comparison between Jacob Fatu’s WWE treatment compared to Bron Breakker. The issue took center stage after insights revealed that Paul Heyman’s involvement may be influencing the direction of these promising talents.
Rising WWE Stars Earning Fan Favor
WWE’s current main roster features a strong group of young wrestlers who have quickly become crowd favorites. Among them are Dominik Mysterio, Rhea Ripley, Liv Morgan, Bron Breakker, and Jacob Fatu, all making headlines and impressing fans while being in their early thirties. These superstars exemplify WWE’s next generation, with Fatu and Breakker in particular standing out for their rapid ascent and popularity.
Breakker and Fatu: Parallel Successes With Different Paths
Jacob Fatu and Bron Breakker were both elevated to significant roles on their respective WWE brands and secured single championships within a year of their debuts. At WrestleMania 41, Bron Breakker entered the event as Intercontinental Champion, while Fatu left with the United States Championship. Their similar upward trajectories have sparked conversation about how each is positioned within WWE storylines.
Vince Russo Comments on Disparate Treatment
On an episode of Legion of RAW on Sportskeeda WrestleBinge, wrestling veteran Vince Russo drew attention to the contrasting approaches WWE takes with these stars. Russo highlighted similarities between Fatu and Breakker’s character appeal but emphasized a critical difference in how management handles them. He attributed this divergence to Paul Heyman’s influence, which may be shaping the opportunities available to Breakker over Fatu.
“One guy who has absolutely, 1000% gotten over on his own on his own, without a shadow of a doubt is [Jacob] Fatu. Why? Because he’s cool. He looks cool, his language, his little catchphrases are cool. Bron Breakker is in that same exact category. You let that dude go, he’s going to get over because everybody wants to be him. Why are we treating these two people differently man? I’ll tell you why, because Paul Heyman said, ‘Give me Bron Breakker,’ That’s why,”
Russo said. —Vince Russo, Wrestling Veteran
Recent Storylines Demonstrate Their Roles
Both Fatu and Breakker played prominent roles in a recent Money in the Bank event, highlighting their importance to WWE’s current storylines. While Bron Breakker and Bronson Reed contributed to Seth’s victory by securing the Money in the Bank briefcase, Jacob Fatu shocked fans by turning on his ‘brother’, Solo Sikoa, preventing him from leaving with the contract. These narrative choices reinforce the differing developmental paths for both wrestlers.
What the Different Approaches Could Mean for WWE
The contrasting treatment of Jacob Fatu and Bron Breakker underscores ongoing debates about the impact of influential figures like Paul Heyman within WWE. As both continue to shape major storylines and draw fan attention, the decisions made now could dictate the direction and longevity of their respective WWE legacies. The company’s future booking will likely reflect these evolving backstage dynamics, with fans and industry insiders keenly watching how each star’s journey unfolds.
