US Opposes 2024 Titanic Salvage : Citing Legal and Ethical Concerns

US Opposes 2024 Titanic Salvage : The US government is planning to cancel a Titanic shipwreck relic expedition next year. Relics from the ship’s wreckage are the purpose of the trip’s purpose. The current administration emphasizes the importance of treating the Titanic’s bones on the ocean floor as a holy burial ground and protecting them under domestic and international legislation. Titanic fragments are submerged.

RMS Titanic Inc. (RMST), a big company with exclusive rights to retrieve the Titanic, is contemplating a robot-led underwater mission. The purpose is to photograph and investigate the sinking ship’s damaged hull. The examination aims to determine if the ship’s hull was damaged. The U.S. District Court in Norfolk, Virginia, is investigating this firm. 

Remember that the government is fighting a legal case over a June undersea occurrence. A separate submersible caused this horrible catastrophe, killing five. The loss was devastating. The claim is against the government and unrelated to the case. The ongoing Titanic wreckage dispute is interesting, but it has nothing to do with the legal case. 

In an ongoing legal battle, US lawyers claim that RMST’s method of entering the ship’s shattered hull violates federal law and a UK bilateral agreement. This claim is based on a UK-US bilateral agreement. They believe the ship is a marine memorial to the 1,500 victims of the 1912 accident. Therefore, they believe it shouldn’t be damaged since it could damage human remains and historical items. They also believe the ship shouldn’t be damaged since it honors the 1,500 victims of the 1912 accident.

US Opposes 2024 Titanic Salvage

Also Read : Feds fine Ship Company Slapped with Million Dollar : Fines for Ocean Dumping Violations

According to court documents, US authorities believe RMST has violated federal laws meant to preserve the shipwreck’s authenticity. RMST replied that their first trip will be in May 2024. It also said it would snap several images of the site and retrieve items from the ocean floor, including ship interiors. The group hopes to bring back things from the ocean floor and snap many images of the place. This was done in response to RMST’s statement that the expedition’s principal purpose is to photograph the entire site. So as to counter what was said. 

RMST has committed to engage with NOAA, the federal organization that protects the public’s interest in the undersea wreck, but it appears the business will not file for a permit. NOAA safeguards public interest in the underground wreck. The NOAA keeps sunken ship enthusiasts informed. US lawyers believe this endeavor must first obtain clearance from NOAA’s Secretary of Commerce.

RMST has questioned whether the U.S. government can interfere with its salvage rights for an international shipwreck. This shipwreck occurred on international waters. This has exacerbated a difficult situation. The corporation claims decades of marine law experience and that only the Norfolk court can handle the dispute fairly.

Important historical point about the current court case: RMST tried to retrieve a radio from another shipwreck in 2020, causing a litigation battle with the US government. This action saved a radio to show the public the heroic story of the guys who made the last emergency calls. An unmanned submersible with dredging and cutting equipment did this. To do this, the process was done. Hope stories were told with the news. After an administrative law court approved the proposal, the US government formalized its opposition. The 2021 pandemic complicated everything